Logarithm properties review (article) | Khan Academy (2024)

Want to join the conversation?

Log in

  • Joey Jang

    7 years agoPosted 7 years ago. Direct link to Joey Jang's post “How did a mathematician f...”

    How did a mathematician find e? What's its origin?

    (22 votes)

    • Divy Shah

      4 years agoPosted 4 years ago. Direct link to Divy Shah's post “It is often called Euler'...”

      Logarithm properties review (article) | Khan Academy (4)

      It is often called Euler's number after Leonhard Euler (pronounced "Oiler")
      e is an irrational number (it cannot be written as a simple fraction).

      e is the base of the Natural Logarithms (invented by John Napier).

      e is found in many interesting areas, so is worth learning about. you can check this link to find out:
      https://www.khanacademy.org/math/in-in-grade-11-ncert/in-in-exponential-and-logarithmic-functions/copy-of-math3-e-and-natural-log/v/e-through-compound-interest and https://www.khanacademy.org/math/in-in-grade-11-ncert/in-in-exponential-and-logarithmic-functions/copy-of-math3-e-and-natural-log/v/e-as-limit

      (12 votes)

  • Matthew Johnson

    7 years agoPosted 7 years ago. Direct link to Matthew Johnson's post “in `log_1(1)=x`, doesn't ...”

    in log_1(1)=x, doesn't x = infinity?

    (9 votes)

  • svlohit2012

    4 years agoPosted 4 years ago. Direct link to svlohit2012's post “Why would you need to use...”

    Why would you need to use ln?

    (9 votes)

    • SherlockHolmes.42

      4 years agoPosted 4 years ago. Direct link to SherlockHolmes.42's post “The natural log function,...”

      The natural log function, ln, is the log with a base of Euler's number, e.

      Here is an example of when it can be used:
      e^x = 2
      --> To solve for x, we would take the ln of both sides. This is because x is the exponent of e, and the e and natural log will cancel out when put together.
      ln(e^x) = ln(2)
      x = ln(2)

      This is the most common way I've seen the natural log used, but there are no doubt other ways to use it.

      (9 votes)

  • Haoyu Wang

    2 years agoPosted 2 years ago. Direct link to Haoyu Wang's post “why e^𝝿i+1=0?How did Eu...”

    why e^𝝿i+1=0?
    How did Euler proof this equation?

    (8 votes)

    • KLaudano

      2 years agoPosted 2 years ago. Direct link to KLaudano's post “It is a specific case of ...”

      It is a specific case of his formula, e^(i*x) = cos(x) + i*sin(x). The proof of this formula requires Calculus level math though (e.g. power series or differentiation).

  • brandon_bolster

    5 years agoPosted 5 years ago. Direct link to brandon_bolster's post “Is ln the same thing as l...”

    Is ln the same thing as log base 10?

    (7 votes)

    • Oliver

      5 years agoPosted 5 years ago. Direct link to Oliver's post “The "log" key on a calcul...”

      The "log" key on a calculator is log base 10. "ln" is natural logarithm, and there is a video for that here: https://www.khanacademy.org/math/algebra2/exponential-and-logarithmic-functions/e-and-the-natural-logarithm/v/natural-logarithm-with-a-calculator

      (7 votes)

  • Sellov

    4 years agoPosted 4 years ago. Direct link to Sellov's post “What is log_15 (9), if lo...”

    What is log_15 (9), if log_15 (5) = a
    The answer is: 2-2a

    Could someone explain the steps to solve this?

    (7 votes)

    • Katriana

      2 years agoPosted 2 years ago. Direct link to Katriana's post “I can explain how to chec...”

      I can explain how to check it, at least, though I'm not sure that this is how you would originally come to this answer.
      log_15(5)=a, and we want to see whether log_15(9)=2-2a. We can begin by finding a.
      log_15(5)=a
      log(5)/log(15)=a Use the change of base rule.
      a=approx. 0.5943
      Next we can find 2-2a:
      2-2*approx.0.5943 Try to use the entire answer you got for a, instead of a rounded one, if you can.
      2-approx. 1.1886=approx. 0.8114
      Now we can find log_15(9), and see if it equals 0.8114.
      log_15(9)=log(9)/log(15) Change of base rule.
      log(9)/log(15)=approx. 0.8114
      log_15(9)=2-2a True.
      This shows that it is indeed the case that if log_15(5)=a, then log_15(9)=2-2a, but it does not seem like it is the way that you would come to figure it in the first place.
      Perhaps if you figured that a=approx. 0.5943, and that log_15(9)=approx. 0.8114, you might just happen to notice that 0.8114+2(0.5943)=approx. 2. I have not figured anything better than this for this question. Maybe someone else will. For now, I hope you have a good day. Keep going!

      (5 votes)

  • Andy Huang

    6 years agoPosted 6 years ago. Direct link to Andy Huang's post “How do you do log base 2 ...”

    How do you do log base 2 x + log base 3 x = 4?

    (6 votes)

  • Muhammadaminbek

    7 years agoPosted 7 years ago. Direct link to Muhammadaminbek's post “Can anyone explain to me ...”

    Can anyone explain to me how to solve e^ln^2 x +x^lnx =2e^4

    (5 votes)

  • Matthew Johnson

    7 years agoPosted 7 years ago. Direct link to Matthew Johnson's post “Why is the base 10 logari...”

    Why is the base 10 logarithmic scale the standard for calculators?

    (1 vote)

    • Judith Gibson

      7 years agoPosted 7 years ago. Direct link to Judith Gibson's post “Probably because the rest...”

      Probably because the rest of our number system is built around powers of 10 --- tens, hundreds, thousands, etc. and tenths, hundredths, thousandths, etc.

      (7 votes)

  • Julicz

    3 years agoPosted 3 years ago. Direct link to Julicz's post “e is the base of the Natu...”

    e is the base of the Natural Logarithms (invented by John Napier), how did he did it and did he calculated the logarithms by hand?

    (3 votes)

Logarithm properties review (article) | Khan Academy (2024)
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Sen. Emmett Berge

Last Updated:

Views: 6351

Rating: 5 / 5 (80 voted)

Reviews: 95% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Sen. Emmett Berge

Birthday: 1993-06-17

Address: 787 Elvis Divide, Port Brice, OH 24507-6802

Phone: +9779049645255

Job: Senior Healthcare Specialist

Hobby: Cycling, Model building, Kitesurfing, Origami, Lapidary, Dance, Basketball

Introduction: My name is Sen. Emmett Berge, I am a funny, vast, charming, courageous, enthusiastic, jolly, famous person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.